By Eli S. Susman, PhD, Author of Micropractice
A client returns the week after you assign homework and says, almost before sitting down, “I didn’t do it.”
They meant to.
The thought record was folded inside their bag. They left the session genuinely intending to follow through.
Then work ran late. Dinner had to be figured out. And by the time the house was quiet, the worksheet felt like one more demand from a day that had already asked too much.
Now the missed homework is becoming evidence in the client’s case against themselves:
I’m lazy.
I never follow through.
I can’t even do therapy right.
Clinicians know this moment. The gap between knowing what helps and actually doing it.
And worksheets are hardly the only thing that fall into it.
Mindfulness, for example, has become an increasingly common part of mental health care. Yet among those who learn meditation, fewer than one in four practice daily. Fewer than half even once a week. And the drop-off is especially steep among the very people who stand to benefit most: those who turn to meditation for their mental health (Lam et al., 2023).
Often, the problem isn’t knowing what to do. It’s getting ourselves to do it when life is busy, overwhelming, or simply has other plans.
So what if we made the helpful thing easier to begin?
That’s the idea behind micropractice.
A micropractice is a well-being practice that takes 30 seconds or less (Susman et al., 2026). This not only lessens the barrier to entry but also the time and commitment needed to pursue meaningful benefits.
That might mean three slow breaths before opening your laptop, a hand on your heart during a hard moment, or a simple yoga pose between sessions.
Some micropractices don’t require you to stop at all. They simply shift how you move through what you’re already doing: washing dishes while enjoying the texture of the suds, walking to the grocery store and feeling the ground beneath your feet, or listening to someone without just waiting for your turn to speak.
Micropractice is not a hack. It’s not a watered-down version of “real” mindfulness. It’s not a claim that complex suffering has a 30-second solution. And it’s not a replacement for psychotherapy or any longer practice that is already helping. Just like brushing your teeth doesn’t replace the dentist, micropractice is not a replacement for professional mental healthcare. Micropractice can help the next therapeutic action be easier to start, easier to remember, and easier to repeat. Between sessions. Before a difficult conversation. After a painful thought. Even while waiting for the microwave to ping.
The goal is to make well-being more accessible and to help carry the benefits of practice into everyday life. Because even when we carve out time to meditate or do yoga, the calm tends not to last. For a moment, there is relief. But then life rushes back in, and that hard-won serenity slips away. It gets boxed-up. Compartmentalized. And too-often we’re left right back where we started.
Micropractice helps bring that continuity off the mat and into the rest of the day.
What Matters More Than Minutes
But micropractice raises an obvious question: if we shrink a practice, do we also shrink its benefits?
Not necessarily.
Across several lines of research, across a range of well-being practices, a more interesting pattern has emerged: it’s not about how much time you spend, but how consistent you are, that predicts the best outcomes.
A 2020 meta-analysis examined 203 randomized controlled trials of mindfulness-based programs, representing 15,971 participants. Overall, the programs helped. But longer practice sessions did not predict greater improvements in depression, anxiety, or stress (Strohmaier, 2020). There was even a hint that shorter sessions might be especially helpful for easing depression symptoms, but that association was no longer statistically significant after the researchers corrected for the fact that they had run many statistical tests, which increases the odds of a chance finding.
That doesn’t mean 20 seconds is equivalent to an eight-week MBCT course. The meta-analysis compared varied programs, and some people, outcomes, and contexts may benefit from more time. Still, across these outcomes, longer sessions showed no clear advantage over shorter ones.
The same pattern showed up in the real world. In an observational study of 21,088 Headspace users reporting moderate or severe perceived stress, researchers objectively tracked both how often people meditated and how long each session lasted (Callahan et al., 2024). Consistent practice was associated with reduced stress. Longer sessions were not.
And it’s not just mindfulness. A meta-analysis of 137 trials of touch interventions and practices involving 12,966 people found a similar pattern (Packheiser et al., 2024). More sessions were associated with better outcomes. Longer sessions were not. In fact, when it came to reducing cortisol and blood pressure, shorter sessions were more effective than longer ones.
Breathwork pointed in the same direction. A meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials of breathwork interventions (like slow deep breathing) involving 785 adults found that reductions in stress was not associated with how long each session lasted (Fincham et al., 2023).
And sometimes, breaking movement into smaller pieces may work better than doing the same amount all at once. In one study, six five-minute walks spread across the day improved mood, fatigue, and food cravings more than the same 30 minutes of walking done all at once (Bergouignan et al., 2016).
So for a wide range of well-being practices, it may be less about the clock and more about consistency.
When Smaller May Be Safer
Micropractice may offer another advantage: it can ask less of us not just logistically, but emotionally.
Have you ever tried to calm your mind, and accidentally opened the floodgates instead?
You sit down. You breathe. And suddenly your brain decides it’s an excellent time to revisit every painful memory you’ve ever had.
If so, that doesn’t mean you’re doing it wrong.
For some people, especially those carrying a history of trauma, sustained attention inward may bring intrusive memories, emotional discomfort, dissociation, or traumatic re-experiencing closer to the surface. Research likewise suggests that childhood adversity and PTSD symptoms may be associated with a greater likelihood of adverse meditation experiences, including traumatic re-experiencing, and, in some contexts, poorer outcomes (Canby et al., 2025; Goldberg et al., 2022; Zhu et al., 2019).
In one study, 151 participants meditated with their eyes closed for five minutes. And even within that short window, participants with a history of stressful and traumatic life events and trauma-related symptoms were more likely to experience distress during the meditation. But during the first 100 seconds, attention tended to hold steady and was not associated with how the rest of the session unfolded, suggesting micropractice may give people a safer way in, without dropping them into the deep-end (Zhu et al., 2019).
Mindfulness Without Making More Time
Sometimes the easiest way to make room for practice is not to make more room at all. Informal mindfulness does exactly that. It brings deliberate nonjudgmental awareness to what you’re already doing: washing your hands, walking down a hallway, eating a meal.
Across studies, this kind of mindfulness woven into daily life has been more strongly and more consistently associated with positive outcomes than formal meditation: greater well-being, lower stress, fewer sleep problems, more flexible thinking, increased mindful awareness, even reduced interference from chronic pain (Birtwell et al., 2019; Brintz et al., 2024; Djernis et al., 2019; Kakoschke et al., 2021; Manigault et al., 2021; Mettler et al., 2024; Petrovic et al., 2025; Wu et al., 2025).
Not bad for something you were going to do anyway.
And the reason’s actually pretty simple:
Life isn’t lived in 30-minute meditation sessions.
It’s lived in the other 23 hours and 30 minutes of your day.
That’s where mindfulness truly shines—not by pulling us out of life, but by calling us more fully into it.
What Can 20 Seconds Do?
The studies so far make the case for less time. Now let’s look at what “less” can actually mean.
Self-compassionate touch is a 20-second micropractice thatpairs self-soothing touch with a kind inner voice.
In our 2024 randomized controlled trial, 135 undergraduates were randomly assigned to learn self-compassionate touch or a matched finger-tapping active control, then invited to practice for 20 seconds a day for a month (Susman et al., 2024).
Compared to the daily finger tappers, practicing self-compassionate touch for 20 seconds a day was associated with improvements in self-compassion, stress, and mental health symptoms. But what surprised us most wasn’t that it worked, but how much it worked. The size of the effects were comparable to much more time intensive interventions.
The exact script used in the study (Susman et al., 2024, Supplementary Materials) was:
You’re invited to allow your eyes to close… Bringing to mind a recent mistake, or a failure or something about yourself that has been bothering you lately, or has made you feel unworthy, unloved, or not enough... and notice what arises in your body as you bring this to mind... sending kindness and warmth to yourself by bringing one hand to your belly and the other to your chest with the energy of giving yourself a hug… allow yourself to embrace what arises in your body… and you’re invited to ask yourself “how can I be a friend to myself in this moment?”… and when you’re ready you may open your eyes.
Clinically, that language of invitation matters. Eyes can remain open or softened. And participants in the study were invited to use any form of touch that supports them in feeling kindness and warmth towards themselves.
Context matters too. For example, around exposure therapy, self-compassionate touch may be best positioned before the exposure, to support willingness to begin and stay engaged, rather than used during it to make anxiety subside. In one study of socially anxious young adults, a self-compassion intervention delivered before an exposure helped participants remain in the feared situation longer, suggesting potential value when anticipatory anxiety makes exposure harder to start or sustain (Slivjak et al., 2022). Once exposure is underway, though, if the practice becomes something the client relies on to make anxiety disappear or feel safe enough to continue, it may interfere with exposure learning by teaching, in effect, “I can only handle this if I have my calming tool” (Craske et al., 2014, 2022). The aim is to support approach, not escape.
Starting Is Only Half the Story
But even the most thoughtfully placed practice can only help if it actually happens. In our first trial, the self-compassionate touch practice only worked among participants who practiced it regularly (Susman et al., 2024).
Thirty-eight percent of participants practiced daily (Susman et al., 2024)—72% higher than the national rate of daily practice among people taught meditation (Lam et al., 2023). And although our participants were college students completing the study for course credit, daily practice was substantially more common than in comparable studies of 10- or 20-minute mindfulness practices with college students receiving course credit (Berghoff et al., 2017; Cohen & Schleider, 2022).
In other words, shrinking the time makes it easier to start, but starting is only half the story.
So in our next randomized trial, we turned to the other half: coming back.
We recruited 497 adults from across the United States. Everyone learned the same self-compassionate-touch practice used in our earlier study. Half also completed a single, 15-minute, self-guided session covering evidence-based habit-formation strategies. Then we followed both groups for six months (Susman et al., 2026).
At both three and six months, compared with those without habit tools, participants who received the habit tools practiced about a third more often and developed stronger practice automaticity, meaning that beginning the practice required less conscious deliberation.
And the differences didn’t stop with practice. Compared to those without habit tools, the habit-tools group also showed greater increases in self-compassion and self-compassion automaticity (how reflexively self-compassion arose in daily life) at both three and six months, as well as a greater reduction in mental-health symptoms at six months.
Notably, increases in practice automaticity accounted for approximately 40% to 83% of the six-month group differences in self-compassion and mental-health outcomes.
Twenty seconds made the practice easier to begin. Habit formation helped people come back.
And coming back, again and again, appeared to be where much of the benefit lived.
Give the Practice an Address
So if coming back is part of what helps, how do you make the next return easier?
In our study (Susman et al., 2026), the habit lesson organized habit formation around three key ingredients (Harvey et al., 2022; Lally & Gardner, 2013):
-
Cue. Attach the practice to a specific event in a stable context. For example, “After I finish brushing my teeth in the bathroom in the morning.”
-
Reward. When a behavior is rewarding, we are more likely to do it again. Take a moment to savor the benefits and let them land.
-
Repetition. Repeat in the same context, and plan for obstacles. Name the likeliest barriers and plan an if-then response for each. For example: “If the session runs late, then practice after closing the laptop.” “If I don’t have time to practice for 30 seconds, then I’ll practice for 10 seconds.” “If I need privacy, then I’ll go to the bathroom to practice.”
You can make this into a habit plan by putting the pieces together in one sentence:
After [specific cue], at [time/place], I will [specific practice], because [intrinsic reward]. If [likely obstacle], then [backup plan].
For example:
When I park the car in the parking lot on my way to work in the morning, I will practice self-compassionate touch for 20 seconds because it helps me feel calmer and kinder towards myself. If I feel too rushed to do it when I park, I’ll do it at the next red light (eyes open, of course).
Now the plan is no longer “be more mindful.” It has an address.
The Data in “I Didn’t Do It”
That same habit-building logic extends beyond a 20-second practice. It can apply to almost anything we hope a client will carry from the therapy room into the rest of the week.
CBT already aims to interrupt unhelpful habits and establish more useful ones, yet habit principles have been underused in evidence-based psychological treatment (Harvey et al., 2022). Habit tools can help promote the very behaviors we are trying to build, whether that means healthier sleep habits, more presence instead of rumination, or more consistent between-session practice.
A habit lens can change the tone of homework review. Instead of “Why didn’t you do it?” collaborative empiricism can ask:
Was the cue visible? Was the behavior specific enough to start? What obstacle showed up? How can we work around that obstacle next time? What was it like when you did the practice?
Now “I didn’t do it” becomes data. Maybe the cue was too vague. Maybe the behavior needs a way to feel more rewarding. Maybe an obstacle needs a backup plan.
A missed assignment doesn’t have to say anything about the person. It can tell us something useful about the plan, and what to try next.
The Life Between Sessions
A better plan can help a practice stick. But the real goal isn’t just homework completion. It’s access: helping useful skills stay within reach when life gets overwhelming.
Micropractice is not anti-meditation. Longer practice can be valuable in many ways. But most of us are not living in monasteries. We’re just trying to stay sane between group chats, grocery runs, and the ongoing hostage negotiation with our dryer over that sock.
The question is: What if mindfulness could meet us there?
Because the present moment isn’t hiding in a monastery. It’s in the breath you’re taking. The person you’re talking to. The dish in your hand. Micropractice is about learning how to come back to that. Not someday. Not when life gets quiet. But right here, in the middle of everything else.
The research reviewed here suggests that more time is not always the ingredient that matters most. Sometimes the better starting point is a practice small enough to repeat, and repeated enough to matter.
For readers who want to go deeper, my book, Micropractice: A Science-Backed Approach to Calm, Clarity, and Joy in 30 Seconds or Less, brings together the research, step-by-step guidance for 14 micropractices, and practical habit tools for making them part of daily life—even when life feels too busy pause. Learn more at micropractice.com/book
Therapy can do work that 30 seconds cannot. Micropractice can help one small piece of that work stay within reach between sessions.
The point is not to make therapy smaller. It’s to help its skills travel farther—into the moments when they are needed most.
References
Berghoff, C. R., Wheeless, L. E., Ritzert, T. R., Wooley, C. M., & Forsyth, J. P. (2017). Mindfulness Meditation Adherence in a College Sample: Comparison of a 10-Min Versus 20-Min 2-Week Daily Practice. Mindfulness, 8(6), 1513–1521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0717-y
Bergouignan, A., Legget, K. T., De Jong, N., Kealey, E., Nikolovski, J., Groppel, J. L., Jordan, C., O’Day, R., Hill, J. O., & Bessesen, D. H. (2016). Effect of frequent interruptions of prolonged sitting on self-perceived levels of energy, mood, food cravings and cognitive function. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0437-z
Birtwell, K., Williams, K., van Marwijk, H., Armitage, C. J., & Sheffield, D. (2019). An Exploration of Formal and Informal Mindfulness Practice and Associations with Wellbeing. Mindfulness, 10(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0951-y
Brintz, C. E., Polser, G., Coronado, R. A., French, B., Faurot, K. R., & Gaylord, S. A. (2024). Are Formal and Informal Home Mindfulness Practice Quantities Associated With Outcomes? Results From a Pilot Study of a Four-Week Mindfulness Intervention for Chronic Pain Management. Global Advances in Integrative Medicine and Health, 13, 27536130241236775. https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130241236775
Callahan, C., Kimber, J., Hu, E., Tanner, L., & Kunkle, S. (2024). The Real-World Impact of App-Based Mindfulness on Headspace Members With Moderate and Severe Perceived Stress: Observational Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 12(1), e52968. https://doi.org/10.2196/52968
Canby, N. K., Cosby, E. A., Palitsky, R., Kaplan, D. M., Lee, J., Mahdavi, G., Lopez, A. A., Goldman, R. E., Eichel, K., Lindahl, J. R., & Britton, W. B. (2025). Childhood trauma and subclinical PTSD symptoms predict adverse effects and worse outcomes across two mindfulness-based programs for active depression. PLOS ONE, 20(1), e0318499. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318499
Cohen, K. A., & Schleider, J. L. (2022). Adolescent dropout from brief digital mental health interventions within and beyond randomized trials. Internet Interventions, 27, 100496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2022.100496
Craske, M. G., Treanor, M., Conway, C., Zbozinek, T., & Vervliet, B. (2014). Maximizing Exposure Therapy: An Inhibitory Learning Approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 58, 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.006
Craske, M. G., Treanor, M., Zbozinek, T. D., & Vervliet, B. (2022). Optimizing exposure therapy with an inhibitory retrieval approach and the OptEx Nexus. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 152, 104069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2022.104069
Djernis, D., Lerstrup, I., Poulsen, D., Stigsdotter, U., Dahlgaard, J., & O’Toole, M. (2019). A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nature-Based Mindfulness: Effects of Moving Mindfulness Training into an Outdoor Natural Setting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(17), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173202
Fincham, G. W., Strauss, C., Montero-Marin, J., & Cavanagh, K. (2023). Effect of breathwork on stress and mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 432. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27247-y
Goldberg, S. B., Lam, S. U., Britton, W. B., & Davidson, R. J. (2022). Prevalence of meditation-related adverse effects in a population-based sample in the United States. Psychotherapy Research: Journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, 32(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2021.1933646
Harvey, A. G., Callaway, C. A., Zieve, G. G., Gumport, N. B., & Armstrong, C. C. (2022). Applying the science of habit formation to evidence-based psychological treatments for mental illness. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 17(2), 572–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621995752
Kakoschke, N., Hassed, C., Chambers, R., & Lee, K. (2021). The importance of formal versus informal mindfulness practice for enhancing psychological wellbeing and study engagement in a medical student cohort with a 5-week mindfulness-based lifestyle program. PLOS ONE, 16(10), e0258999. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258999
Lally, P., & Gardner, B. (2013). Promoting habit formation. Health Psychology Review, 7(sup1), S137–S158. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2011.603640
Lam, S. U., Riordan, K. M., Simonsson, O., Davidson, R. J., & Goldberg, S. B. (2023). Who Sticks with Meditation? Rates and Predictors of Persistence in a Population-based Sample in the USA. Mindfulness, 14(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-022-02061-9
Manigault, A. W., Slutsky, J., Raye, J., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Examining practice effects in a randomized controlled trial: Daily life mindfulness practice predicts stress buffering effects of mindfulness meditation training. Mindfulness, 12(10), 2487–2497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01718-1
Mettler, J., Zito, S., Bastien, L., Bloom, E., & Heath, N. L. (2024). How we teach mindfulness matters: Adolescent development and the importance of informal mindfulness. Journal of School Psychology, 105, 101323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101323
Packheiser, J., Hartmann, H., Fredriksen, K., Gazzola, V., Keysers, C., & Michon, F. (2024). A systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis of the physical and mental health benefits of touch interventions. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(6), 1088–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01841-8
Petrovic, J., Mettler, J., Böke, B. N., Rogers, M. A., Hamza, C. A., Bloom, E., Di Genova, L., Romano, V., & Heath, N. L. (2025). The effectiveness and acceptability of formal versus informal mindfulness among university students with and without recent self-injury: A randomized controlled trial. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 17(1), e12613. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12613
Slivjak, E. T., Pedersen, E. J., & Arch, J. J. (2022). Evaluating the efficacy of common humanity-enhanced exposure for socially anxious young adults. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 87, 102542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102542
Strohmaier, S. (2020). The Relationship Between Doses of Mindfulness-Based Programs and Depression, Anxiety, Stress, and Mindfulness: A Dose-Response Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials. Mindfulness, 11(6), 1315–1335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01319-4
Susman, E. S., Chen, S., Keltner, D., & Harvey, A. G. (2026). Habit-formation strategies enhance long-term outcomes of a self-compassionate touch micropractice: A randomized controlled trial. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-63457-4
Susman, E. S., Chen, S., Kring, A. M., & Harvey, A. G. (2024). Daily micropractice can augment single-session interventions: A randomized controlled trial of self-compassionate touch and examining their associations with habit formation in US college students. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 175, 104498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2024.104498
Wu, X., De Alwis, J., Dou, Z., Lo, H., Wang, S., & Xu, W. (2025). The Psychological Benefits of Habitual Mindfulness Practice: A Randomized Controlled Trial of MBIs for Psychological Distress (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5177397). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5177397
Zhu, J., Wekerle, C., Lanius, R., & Frewen, P. (2019). Trauma- and Stressor-Related History and Symptoms Predict Distress Experienced during a Brief Mindfulness Meditation Sitting: Moving toward Trauma-Informed Care in Mindfulness-Based Therapy. Mindfulness, 10(10), 1985–1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01173-z
